Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

Secret Service Under Fire as Congress Launches Investigation into "Inexcusable Security Breaches" at Trump Rally

In a shocking turn of events, the US Congress has launched an investigation into "inexcusable security breaches" that occurred at former President Donald Trump’s rally in Pennsylvania. The investigation was prompted by an assassination attempt on Saturday evening, which has raised questions about the Secret Service’s role in protecting presidential candidates.

Background:

The Secret Service was created in 1865 to combat counterfeiting. Over time, its responsibilities have expanded to include protecting the president, vice president, and their families. The agency is also responsible for securing major presidential and vice presidential candidates within 120 days of a presidential election.

The Incident:

On Saturday evening, a shooter opened fire at Trump’s rally in Pennsylvania, prompting an assassination attempt. The FBI has confirmed that it was an intentional act of violence and is investigating the incident.

Consequences:

The incident has led to widespread criticism of the Secret Service’s handling of security protocols at the rally. Many have called for an immediate investigation into the role of the agency in the incident.

Response from the Secret Service:

In a statement, the Secret Service said that claims that they had turned down a request from Trump’s team for additional security were "absolutely false." They added that they had increased their resources and capabilities in response to the increased campaign travel tempo.

Investigation:

Congress has launched an investigation into the incident, with both Republicans and Democrats calling for an immediate investigation. The FBI has confirmed that it will conduct a thorough investigation into the incident.

Timeline of Presidential Protection:

• 1865: The Secret Service was created to combat counterfeiting.
• 1881: President James Garfield was assassinated, prompting an expansion of the Secret Service’s responsibilities to include presidential protection.
• 1901: President William McKinley was assassinated, further expanding the Secret Service’s role.
• 1917: Congress passed legislation making it a crime to threaten the president.
• 1981: President Ronald Reagan was shot by John Hinckley Jr. in an assassination attempt.
• 2005: President George W. Bush faced an assassination attempt in Tbilisi, Georgia, but a grenade failed to detonate.

Frequently Asked Questions:

Q: What is the Secret Service’s role in protecting presidential candidates?
A: The Secret Service is responsible for protecting major presidential and vice presidential candidates within 120 days of a presidential election.

Q: What happened during the assassination attempt at Trump’s rally in Pennsylvania?
A: A shooter opened fire at the rally, prompting an assassination attempt.

Q: What is the Secret Service’s response to the incident?
A: The Secret Service has said that claims they turned down a request from Trump’s team for additional security were "absolutely false."

Q: What is the next step in the investigation?
A: The FBI is conducting a thorough investigation into the incident, and Congress has launched an investigation into the role of the Secret Service.

Q: What has happened in the past when presidential protection has failed?
A: At least seven assaults have occurred on presidents while they were under Secret Service protection. One attack, the attempt on John F. Kennedy in 1963, was fatal.

Q: Can you provide more information on the history of the Secret Service?
A: Yes, the Secret Service was created in 1865 to combat counterfeiting and has since expanded its responsibilities to include protecting the president, vice president, and their families.

Conclusion:

The incident at Trump’s rally in Pennsylvania has raised serious questions about the Secret Service’s role in protecting presidential candidates. As the investigation continues, it is clear that the agency has some explaining to do. With the safety of our leaders at stake, it is imperative that we hold them accountable for any lapses in security protocols.

Author: www.ft.com

Orginal Source link